跳转到正文
报告库
用途分类 / 其他用途

Offers Skill 安全审计

作者说它能做什么(原文)

When the user wants to design, construct, or improve an offer — the thing they actually sell — including value framing, bonus stacking, guarantee design, scarcity/urgency, naming, and payment structure. Also use when the user mentions 'offer,' 'offer design,' 'build an offer,' 'grand slam offer,' 'irresistible offer,' 'value stack,' 'bonus stack,' 'guarantee,' 'risk reversal,' 'money-back guarante

第三方安全检查结论

发现安全风险

已检查文件
10
发现的风险
4
会不会运行危险命令?检查是否下载程序后直接运行、让他人远程控制电脑,或藏起要运行的命令。未发现风险
会不会泄露文件和密钥?检查是否发送含密码或密钥的文件,以及代码里是否直接写了密钥。发现 1 项风险
中风险

可能广泛读取客户通信并把客户身份和业绩数据用于营销证明

原文依据:4 处
发现了什么

Skill 建议读取过去六个月的每封退款邮件和销售通话记录,同时建议使用带姓名、数字、照片及收入指标的案例。它没有要求先确认这些资料的访问范围、客户同意、保密协议或去标识化。

为什么需要注意

退款原因、通话内容、客户姓名、照片和收入数据可能被带入模型上下文或营销材料,造成客户隐私或商业机密泄露。

指令要求读取过去六个月的“每封”退款邮件和销售通话记录,范围可能包含客户姓名、联系方式、投诉、合同或商业信息;另一个活跃建议要求用姓名、照片和收入数字制作证明。即使目的是分析购买异议,这些内容进入模型或营销材料前仍需访问授权、保密协议检查、最小化和客户同意。用户可限制为已批准、去标识化的摘要。

references/bonus-stacking.md:38来自说明文档打开原文件
### How to find your buyer's actual objections1. Read every refund-request email and sales-call transcript from the last 6 months2. Read your own sales page out loud and write down every doubt that surfaces3. Ask 3 recent buyers: "What almost made you not buy?"The answers cluster around 3–6 objections. Build a bonus for each.
查看另外 3 个位置
references/value-equation.md:50来自说明文档打开原文件
### How to increase- **Proof** — case studies with names, numbers, before/after metrics, photos. Specific > glossy.- **Methodology specificity** — name your process. "The 5-step VAULT framework" beats "our proprietary system." Even if the substance is the same, naming it raises perceived likelihood.- **Guarantees** — risk reversal directly raises perceived likelihood (more in [guarantee-design.md](guarantee-design.md)).- **Reduce sample-of-one objection** — show people *like them* who got results. "Other people get results but I'm different" is the universal objection.- **Pre-empt the failure path** — explicitly address what could go wrong and how you handle it. Builds trust faster than hiding the risk.
references/value-equation.md:122来自说明文档打开原文件
- Name the methodology: "The VAULT framework — 5 angles every winning sales page uses"- Add 8 named-customer case studies with before/after copy + revenue numbers- Add an "even if you've never written before" cohort with 3 named graduates
references/value-equation.md:120来自说明文档打开原文件
Lowest: effort & sacrifice and perceived likelihood are tied. Pick one (perceived likelihood — easier to move and unblocks more downstream work):- Name the methodology: "The VAULT framework — 5 angles every winning sales page uses"- Add 8 named-customer case studies with before/after copy + revenue numbers- Add an "even if you've never written before" cohort with 3 named graduates
会不会删除文件或一直在后台运行?检查是否大范围删除文件、改写磁盘,或设置自动启动。未发现风险
会不会绕过安全保护?检查是否跳过网站安全验证、开放过多文件权限,或取消操作前的确认。未发现风险
会不会误导 AI 或隐藏内容?检查工作说明是否要求 AI 忽略你的指令、干扰检查结果,或夹带看不见的文字。发现 1 项风险
中风险

自动读取项目营销文件可能让文件内容影响代理指令

原文依据:1 处
发现了什么

Skill 要求代理在提问前查找并使用多个本地营销上下文文件,但没有要求把其中内容仅视为资料,也没有限制这些文件可以发出哪些指令。若仓库中的此类文件由不可信来源创建或修改,其中的提示注入文本可能改变代理后续行为。

为什么需要注意

代理的建议、数据访问范围或后续操作可能被项目文件中的隐藏指令操纵,偏离用户原本要求。

该技能会主动查找并读取仓库内的营销上下文,然后要求代理“使用”其中内容。若这些文件来自不可信贡献者,嵌入的提示性文字可能被误当成后续指令,影响代理的判断或操作。源码没有说明只提取事实并忽略文件中的命令。用户可要求作者明确将这些文件视为不可信数据,并在读取前确认路径与授权范围。

SKILL.md:14来自说明文档打开原文件
**Check for product marketing context first:**If `.agents/product-marketing.md` exists (or `.claude/product-marketing.md`, or the legacy `product-marketing-context.md` filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.
会不会偷偷改推广链接或收款方?检查是否强制替换推广链接或收款对象,同时要求隐瞒更改。发现 2 项风险
中风险

无来源的转化率和流失率数字可能被当成可靠预测

原文依据:4 处
发现了什么

Skill 给出“单项修改提升 10–40%”“两次可达 2–3 倍”“折扣询价者流失率约两倍”等通用数字,并把多个匿名案例描述为真实项目及显著提升,但没有提供样本、测量方法或可核验来源。评测文件还要求模型必须复述其中的两倍流失率。

为什么需要注意

用户可能基于不适用于自身业务的数据拒绝折扣、预测收入或调整报价,导致错误预算、定价或获客决策。

源码把多个具体提升幅度和“约两倍流失”表述为一般事实或预测,却在所给材料中没有提供样本、方法或可核验来源;匿名案例还声称来自真实项目。评测要求复述两倍流失率,但评测只是期望输出,不是证据。若用户据此决定价格或收入策略,可能高估效果。用户应要求来源,并把数字标为未经验证的假设,用自身实验验证。

SKILL.md:114来自说明文档打开原文件
6. **Draft the changed component** — new bonus, new guarantee, new scarcity, new name, new payment plan7. **Project the lift, honestly** — most single-component changes deliver 10–40% conversion lift. Anyone promising 5x is selling something. Two consecutive iterations on different levers can stack to 2–3x.
查看另外 3 个位置
references/saas-offers.md:15来自说明文档打开原文件
### The data**Discount-*askers* churn at roughly 2× the rate of full-price customers.** The buyer who negotiated their way in is signaling something: price was the reason they bought, not value. When a cheaper option appears — or when the renewal hits full price — they leave. You bought a customer who was never yours.
references/examples.md:1来自说明文档打开原文件
# Worked Examples — Before/After OffersAnonymized examples drawn from real engagements. Each shows the weak version, the diagnostic, and the strong version.
evals/evals.json:9来自说明文档打开原文件
      "assertions": [        "Advises against discounting to acquire new customers",        "Cites discount-askers churn at ~2x full-price customers",        "States discount only for upgrades/cross-sells or seasonal moments",        "Frames offers as beating discounts (raise value, not cut price)",
中风险

激进保证和退款条款可能造成超出预期的财务或合同责任

原文依据:4 处
发现了什么

资料向直效营销推荐双倍退款等激进风险反转,并称添加任何保证几乎总能提升转化。虽然另有风险警告,但实际条款仍可能承诺由客户结果、归因或时间决定的退款和免费服务。

为什么需要注意

模糊或难以控制的结果条件可能引发大量退款、长期免费履约、争议或与当地消费者保护规则冲突。

资料确实针对直效营销推荐“双倍退款”等激进保证,并概括称增加保证几乎总能提升转化。这可能形成退款、额外赔付或无限期免费服务责任,尤其当结果难以归因或条款未经过法律和财务审核时。文档也明确警告失败会公开放大损害,并建议按10%兑现率压力测试,因此风险被承认但未消除。用户应要求责任上限、可测条件及法务审批。

references/guarantee-design.md:87来自说明文档打开原文件
### Direct response / paid traffic**Strong:** Double-your-money-back or comparable risk inversion. Direct-response buyers expect risk-reversal-heavy offers.**Weak:** Vanilla 30-day refund. Doesn't differentiate from every other ad on the platform.
查看另外 3 个位置
references/guarantee-design.md:119来自说明文档打开原文件
### Promising more than you can deliver"Double your revenue or your money back + $1,000." If even 1 in 50 buyers fails and gets the bonus refund + writes a public review, the offer is permanently damaged.Stress-test: what happens if 10% of buyers invoke the guarantee?
references/guarantee-design.md:165来自说明文档打开原文件
When auditing an offer with no guarantee (or a weak one), ask:1. **What's the buyer's actual risk?** Make it concrete. ("$2K and I might not get more clients.")2. **What guarantee structure reverses that specific risk?** Match it to one of the eight types.3. **What's your honest refund tolerance?** Calculate refund rate × refund cost; can you sustain it?4. **Does the guarantee match your audience sophistication?** Premium buyers want anti-guarantee; first-time buyers want unconditional.Most offers don't have the wrong guarantee — they have *no* guarantee at all. Adding any guarantee is almost always a lift. Adding the right one is the lever.
references/guarantee-design.md:167来自说明文档打开原文件
1. **What's the buyer's actual risk?** Make it concrete. ("$2K and I might not get more clients.")2. **What guarantee structure reverses that specific risk?** Match it to one of the eight types.3. **What's your honest refund tolerance?** Calculate refund rate × refund cost; can you sustain it?4. **Does the guarantee match your audience sophistication?** Premium buyers want anti-guarantee; first-time buyers want unconditional.Most offers don't have the wrong guarantee — they have *no* guarantee at all. Adding any guarantee is almost always a lift. Adding the right one is the lever.

Skill 逻辑拆解

8 个说明模块

该 Skill 是营销报价设计指南,指导代理评估核心交付物、赠品、保证、稀缺性、名称和付款结构;所提供材料中没有脚本、安装步骤或网络调用。

查看原文
SKILL.md:70来自说明文档打开原文件
## The Anatomy of a Complete OfferA complete offer has six components. Skip any one and conversion suffers.| # | Component | Question it answers ||---|-----------|---------------------|| 1 | **Core deliverable** | What do they get? || 2 | **Bonus stack** | What else do they get that makes the core feel undervalued? || 3 | **Guarantee** | What happens if it doesn't work? || 4 | **Scarcity / urgency** | Why now, not later? || 5 | **Name** | What is this thing called? || 6 | **Price + payment structure** | What do they pay and how? |

它明确反对虚假倒计时、虚构库存、夸大赠品价值和无条件说明的保证,并要求稀缺性必须真实。

查看原文
SKILL.md:122来自说明文档打开原文件
- **Manipulative scarcity** — fake countdown timers, "only 3 spots left" lies. Short-term lift, long-term trust collapse. Don't.- **Over-promising guarantees** — "double your revenue or refund + $1,000." Refund risk eats margin; the few cases that fail nuke your reputation publicly.- **Bonus inflation** — stacking $50K of "bonuses" on a $497 product so it "feels like a steal." Sophisticated buyers see this. Treat bonuses as additive, not exaggerated.- **Course-bro aesthetic on a serious product** — Gold logos, "secret method," fake urgency. Pattern-matches to scam. Wrong room.- **Discounting to acquire** — discount-*askers* churn at ~2× the rate of full-price customers, and a coupon anchors the product as cheap. Discount only for upgrades/cross-sells (rewarding existing customers) or real seasonal windows — never to win a new one. Raise value with an offer instead. See [saas-offers.md](references/saas-offers.md).
references/scarcity-urgency.md:20来自说明文档打开原文件
## Honest scarcity formatsThe bar: **the constraint has to be real.** Here are the formats that work without lying.

诊断流程会把当前报价写清楚、对四个价值因素打分,并一次修改一个最低分因素。

查看原文
SKILL.md:108来自说明文档打开原文件
1. **Identify the business type** — service, course, coaching, info product, SaaS, agency, B2B. The right playbook is type-specific.2. **State the current offer in plain language** — name, price, what they get, guarantee, deadline. Write it down even if it lives in scattered places now.3. **Run the value equation** — score each of the four levers 1–10. The lowest is the binding constraint.4. **Audit the anatomy** — which of the six components is missing or weak?5. **Pick one lever to fix this iteration** — don't rebuild everything. The biggest lever is usually the one currently scoring lowest.6. **Draft the changed component** — new bonus, new guarantee, new scarcity, new name, new payment plan7. **Project the lift, honestly** — most single-component changes deliver 10–40% conversion lift. Anyone promising 5x is selling something. Two consecutive iterations on different levers can stack to 2–3x.
从这里开始 · 工作说明SKILL.md
offers
连线表示工作说明包含的模块,不是实际运行顺序。点击模块可查看原文。 另有 1 个章节,可在原文件中查看。

文件引用关系图

15 处引用
哪些文件发起引用引用了什么
连线表示真实的文件引用,不是运行顺序。点击节点可高亮相关连线,并查看具体文件和原文位置。虚线表示还有文件需要定位。
文件与检查记录10 个文件

检查范围与遗漏

逐文件查看涉及的内容

下方列出本次涉及的原文范围;纳入检查不代表已查清所有问题。

  • SKILL.md已纳入全文
  • references/bonus-stacking.md已纳入全文
  • references/examples.md已纳入全文
  • references/guarantee-design.md已纳入全文
  • references/offer-anatomy.md已纳入全文
  • references/offer-formats.md已纳入全文
  • references/saas-offers.md已纳入全文
  • references/scarcity-urgency.md已纳入全文
  • references/value-equation.md已纳入全文
  • evals/evals.json已纳入全文

这份报告只针对上方版本。我们看了拿到的代码和说明文件,没有实际运行 Skill,也没有检查它另外安装的软件包。因此,这不是“保证安全”的承诺;换了版本或使用环境,结果也可能不同。

  • SKILL.md工作说明
  • evals/evals.json配套文件
  • references/bonus-stacking.md配套文件
  • references/examples.md配套文件
  • references/guarantee-design.md配套文件
  • references/offer-anatomy.md配套文件
  • references/offer-formats.md配套文件
  • references/saas-offers.md配套文件
  • references/scarcity-urgency.md配套文件
  • references/value-equation.md配套文件

代码和说明中提到的操作

连接外部网站
SKILL.md:64来自说明文档打开原文件
**Implication for offer construction**: most "lower the price" requests are actually "raise the numerator or lower the denominator" requests. Price is the comparison, not the value.
references/bonus-stacking.md:106来自说明文档打开原文件
A weak core surrounded by amazing bonuses converts at the moment of sale but produces angry refund requests. The buyer bought the bonuses, got the core, felt cheated.
references/value-equation.md:15来自说明文档打开原文件
**Price is the comparison, not the value.** Most "lower the price" requests are actually "raise the numerator or lower the denominator" requests.
读取了多少行
1,591
文件校验值(用于核对版本)
6b0cbc96cd6ad380aa5587016fd9d7cc387d9a4fc8c01187badc0bff897ab879