Unisolated calendar and task text may influence the AI-generated report
Source references: 3The workflow passes meeting/event and task results directly to the AI for integration, but the visible rules do not require externally editable text such as event titles and task summaries to be treated strictly as data. An invitation or task containing directions such as “ignore the rules” or “hide this item” could be mistaken for an instruction.
The report could omit, distort, or unnecessarily disclose schedule and task information, misleading decisions about conflicts, priorities, or free time. The visible workflow only produces a report, so there is no evidence that it modifies the account in response.
The workflow explicitly sends calendar and task results to AI summarization and requires event names and task summaries in the output, but it does not say those fields are untrusted data that must never be followed as instructions. If collaborators can supply meeting titles or task text, prompt-like content could influence the report, such as causing omissions, rewrites, or fabricated content. The source does not show that such text exists or that an attack occurred. A user can ask for strict data/instruction separation and field-only extraction during summarization.
```{date} ─┬─► calendar +agenda [--start/--end] ──► 日程列表(会议/事件) └─► task +get-my-tasks --complete=false [--due-end] ──► 未完成待办列表 │ ▼ AI 汇总(时间转换 + 冲突检测 + 排序)──► 摘要```Show 2 other places
### Step 3: AI 汇总将 Step 1 和 Step 2 的结果整合,按以下结构输出:### 日程安排| 时间 | 事件 | 组织者 | 状态 ||------|------|--------|------|| 09:00-10:00 | 产品需求评审 | 张三 | 已接受 || 14:00-15:00 | 技术方案讨论 | 李四 | 待确认 |### 待办事项- [ ] {task_summary}(截止:{due_date})- [ ] {task_summary}