Failed tests may lead to changes in production widget logic
Source references: 3Although the stated purpose is to implement component tests, the feedback loop explicitly permits adjusting widget logic to make tests pass. It does not require confirming that the failure is a product defect or confine changes to test files.
An agent could change application behavior under `lib/` when the user requested only a test. This may hide a faulty test, alter the real UI or interactions, and create persistent changes beyond the user's authorization.
The Skill is presented as implementing component-level tests, but its failure loop permits “adjust widget logic or test assertions.” If the agent assumes a failure is a component defect, it could change production code such as files under lib/, altering application behavior rather than only adding tests. A user can require test/-only changes by default and explicit approval, with evidence of a product defect, before widget logic is changed.
- [ ] **Step 8: Run and validate.** Execute `flutter test test/your_test_file_test.dart`.- [ ] **Step 9: Feedback Loop.** Review test output -> identify failing matchers -> adjust widget logic or test assertions -> re-run until passing.Show 2 other places
name: flutter-add-widget-testdescription: Implement a component-level test using `WidgetTester` to verify UI rendering and user interactions (tapping, scrolling, entering text). Use when validating that a specific widget displays correct data and responds to events as expected.metadata:- [ ] **Step 7: Verify updated state.** Use `expect()` to validate the UI after the interaction.- [ ] **Step 8: Run and validate.** Execute `flutter test test/your_test_file_test.dart`.- [ ] **Step 9: Feedback Loop.** Review test output -> identify failing matchers -> adjust widget logic or test assertions -> re-run until passing.