Subjective writing patterns are labeled “AI fingerprints” and may be mistaken for evidence of authorship or originality
Source references: 7The Skill requires reports to count “AI fingerprints” and describes its highest severity as behavior “almost only AI” exhibits. Yet its signals are largely writing habits such as parallelism, concessions, rhythm, and transition words, and it acknowledges that several are common in human writing or required by certain genres. The report can support a style assessment, but it cannot by itself establish AI authorship.
If used for hiring, publishing, academic-integrity, contract-acceptance, or disciplinary decisions, ordinary human writing could be misattributed, affecting reputation, payment, acceptance, or publication.
The stated purpose is to identify “AI writing characteristics,” not determine authorship. However, calling matches “AI fingerprints” and defining strong signals as behavior “almost only AI” exhibits could lead users to infer AI authorship or lack of originality. The later warning that humans commonly use these forms, plus genre-specific exclusions, reduces the risk but also confirms that the indicators support style diagnosis only—not proof of AI generation. Users can ask the author to add an explicit non-authorship disclaimer and use less definitive labels.
```# AI 写作特征检测报告**命中 X 处 AI 指纹**Show 6 other places
### 严重度分级- 🔴 强信号 — 几乎只有 AI 会这样做- ⚠️ 中信号 — AI 高频但人也可能做- 💡 弱信号 — 需要结合体裁和上下文判断## 误伤警告以下句式人类作者也高频使用，不能机械判定为 AI 味：| 特征 | 触发阈值 | 说明 ||---|---|---|| 「不是 X 是 Y」(#8) | 800 字内出现 3 次以上 | 鲁迅、李敖、罗翔都用。低密度是正常修辞 || 替读者说蠢话 (#7) | 虚构的读者声音明显被矮化 | 这是经典修辞 prolepsis，本身不是 AI 特征 || 收束金句 (#13) | 仅适用于公众号长文 | 短视频文稿段段金句是体裁要求 || 堵住反驳 (#1) | 仅适用于自媒体/社交媒体 | 学术写作和法律论证穷尽反驳是规范 || 命名仪式 (#5) | 同一篇出现 2 次以上同一句式 | 偶尔用一次是正常修辞 |name: dbs-ai-checkdescription: 扫描文案中的 AI 写作特征并输出检测报告，默认只诊断不改写。用户要求检查 AI 味、AI 痕迹或机器化表达时使用。---**命中 X 处 AI 指纹**- 🔴 强信号 — 几乎只有 AI 会这样做- ⚠️ 中信号 — AI 高频但人也可能做- 💡 弱信号 — 需要结合体裁和上下文判断以下句式人类作者也高频使用，不能机械判定为 AI 味：| 特征 | 触发阈值 | 说明 ||---|---|---|| 「不是 X 是 Y」(#8) | 800 字内出现 3 次以上 | 鲁迅、李敖、罗翔都用。低密度是正常修辞 || 替读者说蠢话 (#7) | 虚构的读者声音明显被矮化 | 这是经典修辞 prolepsis，本身不是 AI 特征 || 收束金句 (#13) | 仅适用于公众号长文 | 短视频文稿段段金句是体裁要求 || 堵住反驳 (#1) | 仅适用于自媒体/社交媒体 | 学术写作和法律论证穷尽反驳是规范 || 命名仪式 (#5) | 同一篇出现 2 次以上同一句式 | 偶尔用一次是正常修辞 |